From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754144AbZBWRXe (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:23:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751274AbZBWRX0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:23:26 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40315 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbZBWRXZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:23:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:23:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/markers: make markers select tracepoints Message-ID: <20090223172302.GB29344@elte.hu> References: <499EE162.4050008@oracle.com> <20090220172241.GF24538@elte.hu> <1235302980.4632.8.camel@laptop> <1235304876.4632.10.camel@laptop> <20090222122424.GA9951@redhat.com> <1235387487.4645.28.camel@laptop> <20090223154404.GA30147@redhat.com> <1235406159.4645.366.camel@laptop> <20090223171032.GA2566@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090223171032.GA2566@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Furthermore, trace_mark() exposes that crap like an ABI, now > > suppose some distro goes and declares that stable for some > > daft reason, imagine the poor sod having to fix something > > littered with trace_mark(). > > The impression that this is somehow different with tracepoints > is mistaken. Tracepoints are *exactly* as "ABI-like" as > markers. they arent. To the kernel they look like function calls, with no ABI properties at all. They can and will change without notice. Ingo