From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757474AbZBWWYX (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:24:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753095AbZBWWYF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:24:05 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42064 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753024AbZBWWYD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:24:03 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Arve =?iso-8859-1?q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:23:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , pm list , Len Brown , Jesse Barnes , Thomas Gleixner References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@sisk.pl> <200902221839.50357.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902232323.25583.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 23 February 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Introduce two helper functions allowing us to disable device > > interrupts (at the IO-APIC level) during suspend or hibernation > > and enable them during the subsequent resume, respectively, so that > > the timer interrupts are enabled while "late" suspend callbacks and > > "early" resume callbacks provided by device drivers are being > > executed. > > > > Use these functions to rework the handling of interrupts during > > suspend (hibernation) and resume. Namely, interrupts will only be > > disabled on the CPU right before suspending sysdevs, while device > > interrupts will be disabled (at the IO-APIC level), with the help of > > the new helper function, before calling "late" suspend callbacks > > provided by device drivers and analogously during resume. > > > > What impact does this have on wakeup interrupts? Unless you add a > check, after masking all interrupt at the CPU, to abort suspend if any > wakeup interrupt has IRQ_PENDING set I think you will loose wakeup > interrupts (at least for irqs that use default_disable). I _think_ they would have to be reenabled after we've called local_irq_disable(). Thanks, Rafael