From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760156AbZBXUwk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751557AbZBXUwb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:31 -0500 Received: from rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de ([129.143.116.10]:45575 "EHLO rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751435AbZBXUwa (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:52:27 +0100 From: Andreas Mohr To: Tino Keitel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc Message-ID: <20090224205227.GA17485@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090224190850.GA27800@dose.home.local> X-Priority: none User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What, no_console_suspend of course ;) Needless to say I'm also stuck as always, waiting for -rc resume regressions (due to i945 I think, -rc4 currently) to vanish (I believe -rc6 wouldn't fix it yet, may try -rc7 then). How many suspend/resume regression reports did we have in 2.6.29-rc? 5? 6? 7? When did I first have 30+ working suspend/resumes on a desktop PC? 2001? 2000? 1999? I'm not entirely sure whether I can achieve similar reliability on a convincing number of desktops 10 years later... Andreas Mohr