From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761382AbZBXXAw (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:00:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759508AbZBXXAM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:00:12 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50612 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756594AbZBXXAH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:00:07 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andreas Mohr Subject: Re: Suspend regression with 2.6.29-rc Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:59:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tino Keitel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090224205227.GA17485@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20090224205227.GA17485@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902242359.49802.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Andreas Mohr wrote: > What, no_console_suspend of course ;) > > Needless to say I'm also stuck as always, waiting for -rc resume regressions > (due to i945 I think, -rc4 currently) to vanish > (I believe -rc6 wouldn't fix it yet, may try -rc7 then). > How many suspend/resume regression reports did we have in 2.6.29-rc? 5? 6? 7? Probably more. :-( Unfortunately, we had too many changes affecting suspend-resume during this cycle, but that only turned out after the fact. Moreover, all of them were done in response to problem reports, but our fixes happened to break things on systems that were not affected by the original issues being fixed. > When did I first have 30+ working suspend/resumes on a desktop PC? 2001? > 2000? 1999? > I'm not entirely sure whether I can achieve similar reliability > on a convincing number of desktops 10 years later... Actually, I can. Thanks, Rafael