[PATCH] drm: edid revision 0 is valid

[Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>]

From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>

edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message
indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed.

We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so
it can't ever be less than 0.

Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be
EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because
of it.

Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 5a4d324..ec14dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
 		DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version);
 		goto bad;
 	}
-	if (edid->revision <= 0 || edid->revision > 3) {
+	if (edid->revision > 3) {
 		DRM_ERROR("EDID has minor version %d, which is not between 0-3\n", edid->revision);
 		goto bad;
 	}