From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kyle@moffetthome.net
Cc: vladislav.yasevich@hp.com, fubar@us.ibm.com, brian.haley@hp.com,
arvidjaar@mail.ru, chuck.lever@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, rjw@sisk.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jamagallon@ono.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: move IPv6 support into a separate kernel module
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:34:56 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090226.233456.216465960.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f73f7ab80902262325q2779f3f5y4870bc30a062971d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Moffett <kyle@moffetthome.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:54 -0500
> I feel extremely nervous about people discussing disabling IPv6 going
> forward. Current estimates are that the first RIRs will begin to
> exhaust their address spaces (after IANA's address space is exhausted)
> early in 2011. If you consider that any change probably won't be in a
> released kernel until June or so, there would be all of 18 months left
> until IPv6 is *required* to contact some hosts on the internet.
Dear Chicken Little,
Please take this elsewhere, you're just distracting from the
discussion, and we don't have time for that.
The fact is that people want to disable ipv6, full stop, for one
reason or another. And all of your talk about firewalling solutions
and "the sky is falling" ipv4 address depletion talk is just ignoreing
reality.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 20:44 Brian Haley
2009-02-25 22:10 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-25 22:14 ` David Miller
2009-02-26 16:44 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-26 18:14 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-26 18:38 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-26 19:49 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-26 19:28 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-26 19:41 ` Chuck Lever
2009-02-26 19:59 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-26 20:01 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-26 20:12 ` Chuck Lever
2009-02-26 20:17 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-26 20:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-26 20:20 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-26 20:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-26 21:56 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 7:25 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-02-27 7:34 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090226.233456.216465960.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
--cc=kyle@moffetthome.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome