From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kenchen@google.com, "menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
mingo@elte.hu,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:09:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090227063955.GS11421@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227140537.390905c4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-02-27 14:05:37]:
> I'd like to change cpuacct.usage_percpu format before it's widely used.
> Current format is not easy to use in hardware with DR feature.
>
> ==
> cpuacct.usage_percpu shows per cpu usage information via cgroupfs.
> It shows all present cpus information and "whose information ?"
> is explained just by index of data implicitly.
>
> IIRC, there is physical cpu hotplug and it can remove
> cpus and change present map. Considering a software which records
> this information pediodically(like sar.), its better to show id of cpu
> in explict way.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Feb24/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.29-Feb24.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Feb24/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -9719,7 +9719,7 @@ static int cpuacct_percpu_seq_read(struc
>
> for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> percpu = cpuacct_cpuusage_read(ca, i);
> - seq_printf(m, "%llu ", (unsigned long long) percpu);
> + seq_printf(m, "%d %llu\n", i, (unsigned long long) percpu);
Seems like a reasonable change, but I wonder if " " should the
separator between the CPU and data, I wounder if we should use
cpu:usage_per_cpu.
--
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 5:05 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 6:39 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-02-27 6:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:01 ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-27 7:03 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-27 7:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:29 ` [PATCH] change cpuacct usage percpu format v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 7:55 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-27 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27 20:13 ` Ken Chen
2009-02-27 23:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 0:00 ` Ken Chen
2009-02-28 0:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 1:11 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-28 5:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-28 9:24 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-28 9:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090227063955.GS11421@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome