From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757594AbZB0INT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757594AbZB0INT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:13:19 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754444AbZB0INI
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:13:08 -0500
Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:35985 "EHLO
	fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753281AbZB0INH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:13:07 -0500
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
       Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@ericsson.com>,
       Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
       Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
       Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
       "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, mingo@elte.hu,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net
In-Reply-To: <1235722003.4948.1324.camel@laptop>
References: <20090227123806.1537.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1235722003.4948.1324.camel@laptop>
Message-Id: <20090227171215.1557.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50 [ja]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:13:02 +0900 (JST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:48 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > I mean make the patch of mathieu's plan and mesure it. Then
> > we can mesure number by number. my number mean,
> > 
> >   (1) How much increasing line and messiness
> >   (2) How much improving latency
> > 
> > that's fairly comparision and typical lkml discussion style, imho.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> Patches are welcome ;-)

Why sad face? Am I talking about funny thing?