mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iommu fixes for 2.6.29-rc7
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:40:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090305114032.GB9548@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090305112215.GB8751@amd.com>


* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> The following changes since commit 559595a985e106d2fa9f0c79b7f5805453fed593:
>   Linus Torvalds (1):
>         Merge branch 'merge' of git://git.kernel.org/.../benh/powerpc
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/linux-2.6-iommu.git iommu/fixes-2.6.29
> 
> FUJITA Tomonori (1):
>       AMD IOMMU: remove unnecessary ifdef
> 
> Hannes Eder (1):
>       IOMMU-API: use ANSI style function declaration for 'iommu_found'
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c |    2 --
>  drivers/base/iommu.c        |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> One fix is for AMD IOMMU and the other one for the IOMMU-API. 
> Please pull.

> 
> Joerg
> 
> Here is the full diff:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> index 5113c08..d7a7c4c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/iommu-helper.h>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
> -#endif
>  #include <asm/proto.h>
>  #include <asm/iommu.h>
>  #include <asm/gart.h>

hm, is this one really needed for .29? We are in late-rc freeze 
mode.

> diff --git a/drivers/base/iommu.c b/drivers/base/iommu.c
> index 5e039d4..c2d1eed 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/iommu.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void register_iommu(struct iommu_ops *ops)
>  	iommu_ops = ops;
>  }
>  
> -bool iommu_found()
> +bool iommu_found(void)
>  {
>  	return iommu_ops != NULL;
>  }

that's ugly indeed albeit too not critical and not a regression 
fix. My inclination would be to pull for the .30 merge window.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-05 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-05 11:22 Joerg Roedel
2009-03-05 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-05 11:44   ` Joerg Roedel
2009-03-05 11:54     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090305114032.GB9548@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®