mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuacct: per-cgroup utime/stime statistics - v1
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:14:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311164416.GD16769@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090311151657.GA16769@balbir.in.ibm.com>

* Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-03-11 20:46:57]:

> * Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-03-10 18:12:08]:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Based on the comments received during my last post
> > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/25/129), here is a fresh attempt
> > to get per-cgroup utime/stime statistics as part of cpuacct controller.
> > 
> > This patch adds a new file cpuacct.stat which displays two stats:
> > utime and stime. I wasn't too sure about the usefulness of providing
> > per-cgroup guest and steal times and hence not including them here.
> > 
> > Note that I am using percpu_counter for collecting these two stats.
> > Since percpu_counter subsystem doesn't protect the readside, readers could
> > theoritically obtain incorrect values for these stats on 32bit systems.
> > I hope occasional wrong values is not too much of a concern for
> > statistics like this. If it is a problem, we have to either fix
> > percpu_counter or do it all by ourselves as Kamezawa attempted
> > for cpuacct.usage (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/4/14)
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bharata.
> > 
> > cpuacct: Add stime and utime statistics
> > 
> > Add per-cgroup cpuacct controller statistics like the system and user
> > time consumed by the group of tasks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/cgroups/cpuacct.txt |    8 +++
> >  kernel/sched.c                    |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/cpuacct.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cpuacct.txt
> > @@ -30,3 +30,11 @@ The above steps create a new group g1 an
> >  process (bash) into it. CPU time consumed by this bash and its children
> >  can be obtained from g1/cpuacct.usage and the same is accumulated in
> >  /cgroups/cpuacct.usage also.
> > +
> > +cpuacct.stat file lists a few statistics which further divide the
> > +CPU time obtained by the cgroup into user and system times. Currently
> > +the following statistics are supported:
> > +
> > +utime: Time in milliseconds spent by tasks of the cgroup in user mode.
> > +stime: Time in milliseconds spent by tasks of the cgroup in kernel mode.
> > +
> 
> Hi, Bharata,
> 
> I did a quick run of the patch on my machine. The patch applied and
> compile cleanly, here are a few comments?
> 
> 1. We could consider enhancing the patch to account for irq, softirq,
> etc time like cpustat does. Not right away, but iteratively
> 2. The accounting is converted to milliseconds, I would much rather
> export it in cputime to be consistent with other cpu accounting.
> I remember we used to return nanosecond accurate accounting and then
> moved to cputime based accounting for cpuacct.
> 3. How do we deal with CPU hotplug. Since we use a per-cpu counter,
> any hotplug would mean that the data related to the offlined CPU is
> lost. That is how the current CPU accounting system seems to work.
>

Bharata,

I tried the diff below and saw what I was looking for

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 015155d..fadd17f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ void account_user_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
 	else
 		cpustat->user = cputime64_add(cpustat->user, tmp);
 
-	cpuacct_update_stats(p, CPUACCT_STAT_UTIME, cputime_to_msecs(cputime));
+	cpuacct_update_stats(p, CPUACCT_STAT_UTIME, cputime);
 	/* Account for user time used */
 	acct_update_integrals(p);
 }
@@ -4257,7 +4257,7 @@ void account_system_time(struct task_struct *p, int hardirq_offset,
 	else
 		cpustat->system = cputime64_add(cpustat->system, tmp);
 
-	cpuacct_update_stats(p, CPUACCT_STAT_STIME, cputime_to_msecs(cputime));
+	cpuacct_update_stats(p, CPUACCT_STAT_STIME, cputime);
 
 	/* Account for system time used */
 	acct_update_integrals(p);
@@ -9611,6 +9611,7 @@ static int cpuacct_stats_show(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
 	for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
 		s64 val = percpu_counter_read(&ca->cpustat[i]);
 		val *= cpuacct_stat_desc[i].unit;
+		val = cputime_to_clock_t(val);
 		cb->fill(cb, cpuacct_stat_desc[i].msg, val);
 	}
 	return 0;

1. The data is returned in clock_t
2. CPU hotplug seems to be already correctly handled by per_cpu
counters

 
-- 
	Balbir

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-11 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 12:42 Bharata B Rao
2009-03-11  0:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-11  8:53   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-11  9:13     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-11 15:34   ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12  0:14     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12  4:29     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-12  4:35       ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-11  1:15 ` Li Zefan
2009-03-11  8:54   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-11 15:16 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-11 16:44   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-03-12  4:44   ` Bharata B Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090311164416.GD16769@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balajirrao@gmail.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome