From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755658AbZCLKtg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:49:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754337AbZCLKtY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:49:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56511 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752056AbZCLKtX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:49:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:47:21 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Pierre Ossman Cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Wu Fengguang , Pekka Paalanen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [GIT PULL] memory saving ring buffer for tip/tracing/ftrace Message-ID: <20090312104721.GA6005@shamino.rdu.redhat.com> References: <20090312023720.144716747@goodmis.org> <20090312080758.4a14d5b4@mjolnir.ossman.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090312080758.4a14d5b4@mjolnir.ossman.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:07:58AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:37:20 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Ingo, > > > > This patch series implements a better memory management by the > > ring buffer. It only allocates the buffers for the online CPUS, as well > > as keeps the buffers to a minimum size until they are used. > > > > Please pull the latest tip/tracing/ftrace tree, which can be found at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > > tip/tracing/ftrace > > > > > > Steven Rostedt (4): > > tracing: keep ring buffer to minimum size till used > > tracing: expand the ring buffers when an event is activated > > tracing: fix trace_wait to know to wait on all cpus or just one > > ring-buffer: only allocate buffers for online cpus > > > > How difficult is it to apply this to 2.6.27? Fedora is still on that > kernel and it would be nice if I could get my memory back on a > distribution kernel. :) I'm looking into it currently. I'll post a test kernel when I have something for you. Neil