From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Norman Diamond <n0diamond@yahoo.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: Off-by-one in both LIBATA and IDE drivers
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:48:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090314084827.2f2b05c2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BB1341.2020203@gmail.com>
> ata_piix should definitely attach to 8086/7111 regardless of the
> subsystem IDs. I can't really explain why it's not. You should at least
> be seeing a message about the ata_piix version, if not then somehow the
> driver probe function isn't even being called..
Because on at least some kernels
hda=noprobe ... etc
does not stop the old IDE layer grabbing the PCI device and continuing to
claim ownership (which means ATA cannot attach to it). Arguably this is
correct behaviour as the IDE layer was asked to ignore the devices *NOT*
to ignore the controller.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-14 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 1:50 Norman Diamond
2009-03-11 3:03 ` Jim Paris
2009-03-11 3:28 ` Norman Diamond
[not found] ` <49B78859.5050807@ru.mvista.com>
2009-03-11 21:03 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-12 11:20 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-12 14:30 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-12 23:02 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-13 7:41 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-13 14:45 ` Robert Hancock
2009-03-14 2:05 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-14 2:15 ` Robert Hancock
2009-03-14 8:48 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-03-14 9:34 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-14 10:48 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-14 8:46 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-11 8:27 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-11 8:38 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-12 0:10 ` Robert Hancock
2009-03-12 2:28 ` Norman Diamond
2009-03-12 4:26 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090314084827.2f2b05c2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=jim@jtan.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=n0diamond@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®