From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760206AbZCPMZs (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:25:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758578AbZCPMZU (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:25:20 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:52847 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758145AbZCPMZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:25:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:22:32 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, David Howells , lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20090316120224.GA16506@infradead.org> References: <20090316105945.18131.82359.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090316120224.GA16506@infradead.org> Message-Id: <20090316211830.1FE8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:59:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation describing the > > option. > > Didn't we decide a while ago that the option is pointless and the code > should always be enabled? Yeah. CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU lost existing reason by David's good patch recently. if nobody of nommu user post bug report in .30 age, I plan to remove this config option at .31 age. his patch is really really good job.