mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: fubar@us.ibm.com
Cc: jesper@krogh.cc, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:39:30 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318.183930.35290998.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>

From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:16 -0700

> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> 
> >From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
> >Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
> >
> >> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> > 	However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> >> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> >> > problem.  That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> >> > 	Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> >> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
> >> 
> >> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).
> >
> >Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
> >me to apply it.
> 
> 	I posted it again with the usual stuff a day or two after I
> posted the test patch; I'll append it to the end of this email.  Note
> that the below patch has a minor cosmetic change from the test patch.
> 
> 	I believe this fix should go to -stable for 2.6.26 and 2.6.27,
> but it'll need the change Jesper added to pick up a macro that was added
> to mainline:

Applied and I'll queue it up for -stable too, thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-16  9:41 Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27  9:25 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 16:28   ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 20:07     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35       ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-28 17:21         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01  6:21         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:19           ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Jesper Krogh
2009-03-05 18:51             ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-09 20:53               ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-13 23:12                 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 23:27                   ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-16 20:34                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 20:35                       ` David Miller
2009-03-17 20:18                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-19  1:39                     ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090318.183930.35290998.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=aowi@novozymes.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jesper@krogh.cc \
    --cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome