From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: fubar@us.ibm.com
Cc: jesper@krogh.cc, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:39:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318.183930.35290998.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:16 -0700
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> >From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
> >Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
> >
> >> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> > However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> >> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> >> > problem. That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> >> > Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> >> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
> >>
> >> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).
> >
> >Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
> >me to apply it.
>
> I posted it again with the usual stuff a day or two after I
> posted the test patch; I'll append it to the end of this email. Note
> that the below patch has a minor cosmetic change from the test patch.
>
> I believe this fix should go to -stable for 2.6.26 and 2.6.27,
> but it'll need the change Jesper added to pick up a macro that was added
> to mainline:
Applied and I'll queue it up for -stable too, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-16 9:41 Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 9:25 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 16:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 20:07 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-28 17:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 6:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:19 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Jesper Krogh
2009-03-05 18:51 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-09 20:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-13 23:12 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 23:27 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-16 20:34 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 20:35 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 20:18 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-19 1:39 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090318.183930.35290998.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=aowi@novozymes.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome