From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 6/6] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE.
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319165736.GO2990@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090318092248.24787.38811.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> [2009-03-18 14:52:48]:
> Currently a sched_domain having a single group can be prevented from getting
> degenerated if it contains a SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flag. But since it has
> only one group, it won't have any scope for performing powersavings balance as
> it does not have a sibling group to pull from.
>
> Apart from not provide any powersavings, it also fails to participate
> in normal load-balancing.
>
> Fix this by allowing such a sched_domain to degenerate and pass on the
> responsibility of performing the POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE to it's parent domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 651550c..0e7882a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6970,6 +6970,20 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
> if (nr_node_ids == 1)
> pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the only flag that is preventing us from degenerating
> + * a domain with a single group is SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE
> + * check if it can be transferred to the new parent,
> + * and degenerate this domain. With a single
> + * group, it anyway can't contribute to power-aware load
> + * balancing.
can't contribute to any form of load balancing or
power savings.
(SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flags has not being
listed in the flags needing more than 1 group)
> + */
> + if (pflags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE && parent->parent) {
> + pflags &= ~SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
> + parent->parent->flags |=
> + sd_power_saving_flags(parent->level);
> + }
> }
> if (~cflags & pflags)
> return 0;
--Vaidy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 9:22 [PATCH v3 0/6] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 1/6] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(), sd_balance_for_*_power() Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 16:22 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 2/6] sched: Record the current active power savings level Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 16:32 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-20 4:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 3/6] sched: Add Comments at the beginning of find_busiest_group Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 16:38 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 4/6] sched: Rename the variable sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 16:41 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 5/6] sched: Arbitrate the nomination of preferred_wakeup_cpu Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 17:23 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-18 9:22 ` [PATCH 3 6/6] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-19 16:55 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-19 16:57 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2009-03-19 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_framework Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090319165736.GO2990@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®