mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:46:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319204646.GB8790@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0903191342120.28292@shell2.speakeasy.net>

* Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> > >> +	pci_remove_bus_device(pdev);
> > >> +	if (bridge && list_empty(&pdev->bus->devices))
> > >> +		pci_remove_bus(pdev->bus);
> > >
> > > I cannot understand the above two lines. Could you explain
> > > what it intend?
> >
> > If the user says:
> >
> > 	echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove
> >
> > And that device is a bridge, then we need to specifically call
> > pci_remove_bus as well, to actually remove the bus itself.
> > Without it, pci_bus_remove_device() will remove all of its
> > children (and subordinate buses) in a depth-first manner, but we
> > will never actually remove the bus that the user specified.
> 
> Did this end up being the source of the pci resource assignment warnings
> that were produced when re-adding a bridge that was removed?

I think that was one reason. I found that it was necessary during
multiple remove/rescan cycles; after the 2nd rescan, we had a
stale pci_bus hanging around that was manifesting itself as a
sysfs issue.

The other thing that Kenji found was in pci_setup_bridge(), where
we don't want to initialize the BARs if the bridge has already
been added.

Thanks.

/ac


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 22:39 [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: pci_is_root_bus helper Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] PCI: pci_scan_slot() returns newly found devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] PCI: always scan child buses Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] PCI: do not initialize bridges more than once Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] PCI: Introduce pci_rescan_bus() Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:27   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:05     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 17:42       ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 17:49         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Greg KH
2009-03-19  9:29   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:34   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 22:55       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 23:21         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:43   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 16:06     ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 16:30     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:17   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 16:41     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 20:43       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 20:46         ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-03-19 23:19       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-20  3:53         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] PCI Hotplug: restore fakephp interface with complete reimplementation Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:45   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:00     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 19:24     ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] PCI Hotplug: rename legacy_fakephp to fakephp Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] PCI Hotplug: schedule fakephp for feature removal Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  8:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:07   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  4:15   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:09 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:13   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  5:16   ` Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090319204646.GB8790@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®