From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: don't block for each kobject_uevent
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:11:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320001134.GB18325@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090319090905.609d3750@infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:09:05AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From d44701ae98a2c43a898dd7a7765d8894fd2e6caa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:02:17 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] kobject: don't block for each kobject_uevent
>
> Right now, the kobject_uevent code blocks for each uevent that's being generated,
> due to using (for hystoric reasons) UHM_WAIT_EXEC as flag to call_usermode_helper().
> Specifically, the effect is that each uevent that is being sent causes the code to
> wake up keventd, then block until keventd has processed the work. Needless to say,
> this happens many times during the system boot.
>
> This patches changes that to UHN_NO_WAIT (brilliant name for a constant btw) so
> that we only schedule the work to fire the uevent message, but do not wait for
> keventd to process the work.
>
> This removes one of the bottlenecks during boot; each one of them is only a small
> effect, but the sum of them does add up.
A faster/easier way to remove this issue is to just set the kernel
helper application to "" in the kernel config. That's what sane distros
do :)
Not to say this patch will not help things, just overall, it doesn't do
much, as your kernel shouldn't even be taking this codepath on modern
distros. If it is, I suggest filing a bug against that distro.
I'll queue it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 16:09 Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20 0:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090320001134.GB18325@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®