From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760325AbZCTSlR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:41:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758307AbZCTSlA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:41:00 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-29.bluehost.com ([69.89.17.211]:37937 "HELO outbound-mail-29.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751689AbZCTSk7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:40:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=GfXqfY95/4kEDTAAXKvHm85mFaMhK+EONlLej5l7bn/IZSd/109jRzMhnssWApwpTyghRPcjvR/qDWaSyoJIKVSHK/fAwgSKmhgXoHq01JPOnYtH/EEpZLf0WFKFuaKP; Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:40:55 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: host mmconfig detect clean up v3 - resend Message-ID: <20090320114055.649e8d9e@hobbes.lan> In-Reply-To: <49C313B7.9060704@kernel.org> References: <20090205181505.GB5661@elte.hu> <20090319193218.445ce0ca@hobbes.lan> <49C313B7.9060704@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:55:35 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Impact: not assume one place for mmconfig in nb > > prepare for following case: amd fam10h + mcp55 > CPU MSR has some range, mcp55 pci config will have another one. > > also prepare for mcp55 + io55 system. every one will have one range. > > if it s mcp55 detect duties to execlude range that is used by CPU MSR > aka, if CPU state bus 0-255, range in mcp55 need to be dropped. > because HW in CPU will not route that mcp55 mmconfig to handle it. I applied this one and cleaned up the changelog considerably. Please check to make sure I got the facts right; I may well have butchered it. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center