mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux@rainbow-software.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network died completely in 2.6.29
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:53:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090327.155346.98210435.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903272351.37610.linux@rainbow-software.org>

From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:51:36 +0100

> upgraded to 2.6.29 today. It appeared to work fine for a couple of hours. But 
> suddenly the network stopped. I wasn't even able to ping my local IP. Even 
> pinging 127.0.0.1 did not work. There were no errors in dmesg and the system 
> appeared to work fine otherwise. Had to reboot (into 2.6.28).
> 
> Never seen this before. Anyone with the same problem?

It's a known problem, the following fix will be submitted
to 2.6.29.1 over the weekend.

GRO: Disable GRO on legacy netif_rx path

When I fixed the GRO crash in the legacy receive path I used
napi_complete to replace __napi_complete.  Unfortunately they're
not the same when NETPOLL is enabled, which may result in us
not calling __napi_complete at all.

What's more, we really do need to keep the __napi_complete call
within the IRQ-off section since in theory an IRQ can occur in
between and fill up the backlog to the maximum, causing us to
lock up.

Since we can't seem to find a fix that works properly right now,
this patch reverts all the GRO support from the netif_rx path.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 net/core/dev.c |    9 +++------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 052dd47..63ec4bf 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2627,18 +2627,15 @@ static int process_backlog(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
 		local_irq_disable();
 		skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue->input_pkt_queue);
 		if (!skb) {
+			__napi_complete(napi);
 			local_irq_enable();
-			napi_complete(napi);
-			goto out;
+			break;
 		}
 		local_irq_enable();
 
-		napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
+		netif_receive_skb(skb);
 	} while (++work < quota && jiffies == start_time);
 
-	napi_gro_flush(napi);
-
-out:
 	return work;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.2.1.222.g570cc


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-27 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-27 22:51 Ondrej Zary
2009-03-27 22:53 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-03-28 19:29   ` Ondrej Zary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090327.155346.98210435.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®