From: npiggin@suse.de
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 11/14] fs: dcache reduce dput locking
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:55:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090329155749.909367317@nick.local0.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090329155539.275927173@nick.local0.net>
[-- Attachment #1: dcache-dput-less-dcache_lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2539 bytes --]
It is possible to run dput without taking locks up-front. In many cases
where we don't kill the dentry anyway, these locks are not required.
(I think... need to think about it more). Further changes ->d_delete
locking which is not all audited.
---
fs/dcache.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dent
void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct dentry *parent;
+
if (!dentry)
return;
@@ -269,23 +270,8 @@ repeat:
if (dentry->d_count == 1)
might_sleep();
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (dentry->d_count == 1) {
- if (!spin_trylock(&dcache_inode_lock)) {
-drop2:
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- goto repeat;
- }
- parent = dentry->d_parent;
- if (parent) {
- BUG_ON(parent == dentry);
- if (!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
- spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
- goto drop2;
- }
- }
- }
- dentry->d_count--;
- if (dentry->d_count) {
+ if (dentry->d_count > 1) {
+ dentry->d_count--;
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
return;
}
@@ -294,8 +280,10 @@ drop2:
* AV: ->d_delete() is _NOT_ allowed to block now.
*/
if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_delete) {
- if (dentry->d_op->d_delete(dentry))
- goto unhash_it;
+ if (dentry->d_op->d_delete(dentry)) {
+ __d_drop(dentry);
+ goto kill_it;
+ }
}
/* Unreachable? Get rid of it */
if (d_unhashed(dentry))
@@ -304,15 +292,31 @@ drop2:
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
dentry_lru_add(dentry);
}
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (parent)
- spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
- spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
- return;
+ dentry->d_count--;
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ return;
-unhash_it:
- __d_drop(dentry);
kill_it:
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+relock:
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ parent = dentry->d_parent;
+ if (parent) {
+ BUG_ON(parent == dentry);
+ if (!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ goto relock;
+ }
+ }
+ dentry->d_count--;
+ if (dentry->d_count) {
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+ printk("elevated d_count\n");
+ return;
+ }
/* if dentry was on the d_lru list delete it from there */
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-29 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-29 15:55 [rfc] scale dcache locking npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 01/14] fs: dcache fix LRU ordering npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 02/14] fs: dcache scale hash npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 03/14] fs: dcache scale lru npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 04/14] fs: dcache scale nr_dentry npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 05/14] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 06/14] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 07/14] fs: dcache scale subdirs npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 08/14] fs: scale inode alias list npiggin
2009-03-30 12:18 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-30 12:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 09/14] fs: use RCU / seqlock logic for reverse and multi-step operaitons npiggin
2009-03-30 12:16 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-30 12:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-30 12:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 10/14] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` npiggin [this message]
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 12/14] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking npiggin
2009-03-30 12:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-30 12:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-30 12:47 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-30 12:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-30 18:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-31 1:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 13/14] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock npiggin
2009-03-29 15:55 ` [patch 14/14] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking npiggin
2009-04-01 14:23 ` [rfc] scale dcache locking Al Viro
2009-04-02 9:43 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090329155749.909367317@nick.local0.net \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®