From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936359AbZDCUe0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:34:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754976AbZDCUeP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:34:15 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57113 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753682AbZDCUeP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:34:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:34:12 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, Joel Becker , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30 Message-ID: <20090403203412.GD14571@wotan.suse.de> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <20090403184605.GC14571@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SUSE Labs, Novell, Inc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:17:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that > > you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing. > > Gaah. I pulled it anyway. Today, I just can't find it in me to care about > ocfs2 testing. Heh, thanks I guess :) > But please - keep this in mind. Even if the commit is old, when you rebase > it, you really do move it into a whole new world order. And yes, it > _usually_ works just fine. > > But to make sure, please do spend some time after setting up the tree to > make sure that what I get really is something that you know is what I want > to get. Point taken. Actually, the pre-rebased branch would have merged fine too, so I really just rebased because of old habit, which isn't a good reason, obviously. Next time, I'll rebase early enough so that we can get a reasonable amount of testing in. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh