From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
manfred@colorfullife.com, peterz@infradead.org,
lethal@linux-sh.org, kernel@wantstofly.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
kyle@mcmartin.ca, deller@gmx.de, davem@davemloft.net,
ralf@linux-mips.org, jes@sgi.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] v2: Make TREE_RCU be default (was CLASSIC_RCU).
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:18:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090406221834.GA7372@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090406221628.GA18232@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:16:28PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Given that there have been no TREE_RCU bugs reported for some months,
> it is time to make TREE_RCU be the default RCU implementation. The rest
> of this series updates defconfig files that: (1) have CONFIG_SMP=y and
> (2) explicitly mention CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU.
>
> Given that I don't have access to most of the relevant hardware, much
> of this is untested.
>
> Changes since v1: per-arch defconfig patches dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
Do you intend to do this for .30 or .31? I'll try to test it as
soon as I can on parisc... Somehow I suspect it won't be the worst
of the problems... :)
regards, Kyle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 22:16 Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-06 22:18 ` Kyle McMartin [this message]
2009-04-06 22:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090406221834.GA7372@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®