mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.29] Fix for enabling branch profiling makes sparse unusable
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:58:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090408175850.GA1158@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2e108260904081029u621e46bbmc95cff280f70085c@mail.gmail.com>


* Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Bart Van Assche
> <bart.vanassche@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One of the changes between kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 is that a branch profiler
> > has been added for if() statements. Unfortunately this patch makes the sparse
> > output unusable with CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING=y: when branch profiling is
> > enabled, sparse prints so much false positives that the real issues are no
> > longer visible. This behavior can be reproduced as follows:
> > * enable CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING, e.g. by running make allyesconfig or
> >  make allmodconfig.
> > * run make C=2
> >
> > Result: a huge number of the following sparse warnings.
> > ...
> > include/linux/cpumask.h:547:2: warning: symbol '______r' shadows an earlier one
> > include/linux/cpumask.h:547:2: originally declared here
> > ...
> >
> > The patch below fixes this by disabling branch profiling while analyzing the
> > kernel code with sparse.
> >
> > See also:
> > * http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/21/18
> > * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12925
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
> >
> > --- orig/linux-2.6.29/include/linux/compiler.h  2009-03-23 19:12:14.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.29/include/linux/compiler.h       2009-03-24 08:46:46.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ struct ftrace_branch_data {
> >  * Note: DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING can be used by special lowlevel code
> >  * to disable branch tracing on a per file basis.
> >  */
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING) && !defined(DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING)
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING) \
> > +    && !defined(DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING) && !defined(__CHECKER__)
> >  void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
> >
> >  #define likely_notrace(x)      __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
> 
> (ping)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is there any chance the above patch will get included in the 2.6.30 kernel ?

it already is part of .30-rc1, see 
d9ad8bc0ca823705413f75b50c442a88cc518b35.

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-08 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-05 14:20 Bart Van Assche
2009-04-07 19:30 ` [tip:tracing/urgent] branch tracer: " Bart Van Assche
2009-04-08 17:29 ` [2.6.29] " Bart Van Assche
2009-04-08 17:58   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090408175850.GA1158@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome