From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:35:51 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414153035.C662.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239662166-13208-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Hi
> Impact: allow filtering by lock name / fix module tracing
>
> Currently, the "lock acquired" event is traced using a TRACE_EVENT.
> But we can't use the char * type for the name without risking to
> dereference a freed pointer. A lock name can come from a module
> towards lockdep and it is risky to only store its address because we
> defer its name printing.
When released lockdep string table?
I guess it only happend at module unloading. if so, we should consider to
make delayed string table freeing at module unloading.
My point is, module unloading is rare event. thus meking pointer safe mechanism
widely avoid string copy.
IOW, if not, ringbuffer is filled tons string. it kill the merit of binary
buffer and current design.
> That's why this patch uses a fixed array size and copy the name.
> Also it lets us filter the lock name because the event filtering
> doesn't handle the char pointers. Such support is not needed yet since
> the events don't use it for now because it is rarely easy to keep track
> of a string while we defer its output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 22:36 Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 21:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 23:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 0:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-14 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-04-14 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 6:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-14 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17 17:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 20:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090414153035.C662.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®