From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Fix the section attribute on UP DECLARE_PER_CPU()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:03:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090415120307.GB17775@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14172.1239795632@redhat.com>
* David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > But yeah, I didn't look at all the details. It _looked_ pretty
> > straightforward to just move the DEFINE/DECLARE stuff up, but
> > there may well be something subtle I'm missing.
>
> The problem is mainly one of #include recursion. There's way too
> much of it.
that should be mapped and eliminated then.
> I wonder if we should replace the standard headerfile boilerplate:
>
> #ifndef _THIS_HEADER_H
> #define _THIS_HEADER_H
> ...
> #endif /* _THIS_HEADER_H */
>
> with something a bit nastier:
>
> #ifndef _THIS_HEADER_H
> #define _THIS_HEADER_H 1
> ...
> #undef _THIS_HEADER_H
> #define _THIS_HEADER_H 2
> #elif _THIS_HEADER_H == 1
> #error Recursive inclusion is not permitted
> #endif /* _THIS_HEADER_H */
>
> and make people break up their header files to avoid getting this
> error.
>
> There are a number of problems with doing this, of course; the
> least of which is that cpp has special code for handling the first
> case efficiently, IIRC.
The other problem with your scheme is that this does not make much
sense.
There is absolutely _nothing_ wrong about defining structures in a
hierarchical way! For example task_struct does have to combine a lot
of derived types. It can use types directly and indirectly as well.
Hierarchical data structures are _good_.
What _is_ wrong here is to allow inline functions _combine_
unrelated types randomly and 'mix up' an otherwise clean and logical
hierarchy of data types.
The solution to this is the creation of a separate data versus
method include file hiearchy: for example mm_types.h and
spinlock_types.h.
Without having looked very deep into this particular problem you are
hitting, this seems to be the problem here too.
There's three too 'thick' headers: linux/percpu.h, linux/prefetch.h
and asm/processor.h.
include/linux/percpu.h, which provides essential data types and core
primitives, also includes:
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/slab.h> /* For kmalloc() */
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/pfn.h>
Just to be able to define an inline method:
static inline void *__alloc_percpu(size_t size, size_t align)
{
/*
* Can't easily make larger alignment work with kmalloc. WARN
* on it. Larger alignment should only be used for module
* percpu sections on SMP for which this path isn't used.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(align > SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
return kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
}
Tada - now we've the combined 'percpu' and 'slab' spaces, on a very
low level! These kinds of cross-dependencies quickly explode and
create circular dependencies the moment you try to include any of
this supposedly-simple header below the 'level' of slab.
The solution for this one?
Please create include/linux/percpu_types.h for basic data types and
simple, self-sufficient primitives. Also have an
include/linux/percpu_api.h or include/linux/percpu.h include file
for convenience/speedup inlines. The latter will only be included in
.c files, where 'combination' of type spaces is not a problem. (it
is a virtue there.)
We did this in a number of other cases, and the concept works well.
There are a number of details along the way, and a lot of build
breakages and wide changes to overcome - but once the basics are in
place that is mostly a mechanic, machine-helped spreading of the
concept, not fragile or troublesome in any way.
The other problem is processor.h:
#include <asm/vm86.h>
#include <asm/math_emu.h>
#include <asm/segment.h>
#include <asm/types.h>
#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/pgtable_types.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/desc_defs.h>
#include <asm/nops.h>
#include <asm/ds.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
That too seems quite wide. linux/prefetch.h as well:
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/cache.h>
It brings in processor.h which brings in a lot of other
dependencies. For a supposedly simple-looking primitive - which is
used in an inline function in processor.h.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 16:10 David Howells
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-14 17:57 ` David Howells
2009-04-14 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 10:24 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 11:40 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-15 13:20 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 14:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 15:09 ` David Howells
2009-04-15 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 18:36 ` David Howells
2009-04-22 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090415120307.GB17775@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®