From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754272AbZDPJT7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:19:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753240AbZDPJTu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:19:50 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47812 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753146AbZDPJTt (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:19:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:18:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Suresh Siddha , "Eric W. Biederman" , Rusty Russell , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/irq: make MSI irq_desc numa aware Message-ID: <20090416091849.GJ9813@elte.hu> References: <49E68C41.4020801@kernel.org> <49E68D64.6060301@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49E68D64.6060301@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > Impact: use irq_desc_alloc_node > > try to get irq_desc on the node in create_irq_nr ok, this seems much clearer and more obvious than the migration stuff. Eric, what do you think? Ingo