From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754552AbZDRGnp (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:43:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752742AbZDRGng (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:43:36 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:40888 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751637AbZDRGnf (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:43:35 -0400 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: AIM9 from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20090418154207.1260.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50 [ja] Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:43:32 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Here is a list of AIM9 results for all kernels between 2.6.22 2.6.29: > > Significant regressions: > > creat-clo > page_test I'm interest to it. How do I get AIM9 benchmark? and, Can you compare CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU is y and n? > brk_test > exec_test > fork_test (!!) > shell_* > fifo_test > pipe_cpy > > Significant improvements: > > signal_test > tcp_test > udp_test