From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757453AbZDSJHc (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:07:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754472AbZDSJHW (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:07:22 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50426 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810AbZDSJHV (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:07:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:06:15 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Yinghai Lu , Jesse Barnes , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@free.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4 Message-ID: <20090419090615.GA30631@elte.hu> References: <49E76864.9060309@kernel.org> <20090416172803.GB16618@elte.hu> <49E7916C.7050701@kernel.org> <49E99054.6050208@kernel.org> <49EA57C4.1000603@kernel.org> <20090419090208.GA30211@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090419090208.GA30211@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > Cool! Yinghai, mind (re-)sending the latest version of the > remaining two patches, so what we can pick this up into the x86 > tree and get it tested? I'd say it's for v2.6.31. (unless someone > can think of a strong reason to do this sooner.) Hm, there's one patch in that lot that does: drivers/pci/bus.c | 8 +++++++- drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 ++++++-- drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Which should go via the PCI tree. I can set up an isolated x86/pci-gap topic that i'll send to Jesse to pull (once it looks to be stable), as the other patches modify the e820 code which we'd like to test in the x86 tree first. Jesse, Linus, Yinghai, does that look like a good plan to you? Ingo