From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>
Cc: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] myri10ge: allow per-board firmware overriding
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090420114041.37c7fa7b@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240108599.5342.11.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:36:39 -0400
David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org> wrote:
> > > We actually thought about supporting "eth2:fwname1,eth0:fwname2". But it
> > > might be hard to implement in this case due to udev possible renaming
> > > interfaces and this firmware names being needed *before* the renaming.
I was thinking about ID as serial number or MAC address - rather than device
name - something that driver specific and uniquely identify device.
> > It seems like this could be done in user space, using the PCI bus ID as
> > a key to select the firmware. The uevent identifies which device is
> > requesting the firmware, so some modification to /lib/udev/firmware.sh
> > should do it.
>
> On further inspection, that should work on Fedora 10, and it looks like
> other distros that use the upstream udev rules. RHEL5 uses a binary
> helper, so changing 05-early-rules.sh to use a script similar to udev's
> firmware.sh would work. YMMV elsewhere, those are the ones I had handy
> and happened to be working on some udev rules.
Module parameters I'm thinking about are not intended only for firmware names,
it could replace any device parameter which is needed during initialization.
Currently devices use module_param_array and code like this:
dev->my_param = default;
if (board_no < MAX_BOARDS)
dev->my_param = my_param[board_no++];
This solution have drawbacks:
- it limits number of device instances which can get parameter
- assume initialization ordering is constant.
- assume initialization is not done in parallel
Providing module_param_id would address this issues, but I have some concerns
before doing it:
- device have to access ID (like serial no) before initialization (at least
before driver will need parameter)
- why nobody already done it - perhaps such thing would be totally useless
Cheers
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49E7239B.4000309@myri.com>
2009-04-17 7:50 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-04-18 18:36 ` Brice Goglin
2009-04-19 0:56 ` David Dillow
2009-04-19 2:36 ` David Dillow
2009-04-20 9:40 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2009-04-20 9:55 ` Brice Goglin
2009-04-20 11:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-04-19 4:09 ` David Miller
2009-04-19 4:41 ` David Dillow
2009-04-19 5:25 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090420114041.37c7fa7b@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=brice@myri.com \
--cc=dave@thedillows.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®