From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1753161AbZDUPY4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753161AbZDUPY4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:24:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751841AbZDUPYr
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:24:47 -0400
Received: from gir.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.77]:36001 "EHLO gir.skynet.ie"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750966AbZDUPYq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:24:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:24:42 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
       Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
       KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
       Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
       Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] Re-sort GFP flags and fix whitespace alignment
	for easier reading.
Message-ID: <20090421152442.GB29083@csn.ul.ie>
References: <1240266011-11140-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1240266011-11140-25-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1240301043.771.56.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090421085229.GH12713@csn.ul.ie> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904211107250.19969@qirst.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904211107250.19969@qirst.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08:46AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, doh. This resorted when another patch existed that no longer exists
> > due to difficulties. This patch only fixes whitespace now but I didn't fix
> > the changelog.  I can either move it to the next set altogether where it
> > does resort things or drop it on the grounds whitespace patches just muck
> > with changelogs. I'm leaning towards the latter.
> 
> Where were we with that other patch? I vaguely recalling reworking the
> other patch (gfp_zone I believe) to be calculated at compile time. Did I
> drop this?
> 

No, you didn't. I have a version still that's promising but doesn't currently
work nor has been tested to show it really helps. It's on the long finger
till pass 2 where it'll be high on the list to sort out.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab