From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix boot crash in NMI watchdog with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y and flat APIC
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:00:15 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904211600.16348.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904202113520.10097@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
fcef8576d8a64fc603e719c97d423f9f6d4e0e8b converted backtrace_mask to a
cpumask_var_t, and assumed check_nmi_watchdog was called before
nmi_watchdog_tick was ever called. Steven's oops shows I was wrong.
This is something of a bandaid: I'm not sure we *should* be calling
nmi_watchdog_tick before check_nmi_watchdog. Note that gcc eliminates
this test for the CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n case.
LKML Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904202113520.10097@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
@@ -414,7 +414,8 @@ nmi_watchdog_tick(struct pt_regs *regs,
touched = 1;
}
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, backtrace_mask)) {
+ /* We can be called before check_nmi_watchdog, hence NULL check. */
+ if (backtrace_mask != NULL && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, backtrace_mask)) {
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); /* Serialise the printks */
spin_lock(&lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-21 1:35 [BUG] NULL pointer crash in early NMI handler Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 6:30 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-04-21 6:33 ` [PATCH] x86: avoid theoretical spurious NMI backtraces with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y Rusty Russell
2009-04-21 8:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: fix boot crash in NMI watchdog with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y and flat APIC tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2009-04-21 8:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: avoid theoretical spurious NMI backtraces with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y tip-bot for Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904211600.16348.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®