From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: hpa@linux.intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch] x64: fix FPU corruption with signals and preemption
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:49:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421224951.GD24073@hera.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239315874.27006.8026.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Suresh Siddha (suresh.b.siddha@intel.com) wrote:
> From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Subject: x64: fix FPU corruption with signals and preemption
>
> Impact: fix FPU state corruption
>
> In 64bit signal delivery path, clear_used_math() was happening before saving
> the current active FPU state on to the user stack for signal handling. Between
> clear_used_math() and the state store on to the user stack, potentially we
> can get a page fault for the user address and can block. Infact, while testing
> we were hitting the might_fault() in __clear_user() which can do a schedule().
>
> At a later point in time, we will schedule back into this process and
> resume the save state (using "xsave/fxsave" instruction) which can lead
> to DNA fault. And as used_math was cleared before, we will reinit the FP state
> in the DNA fault and continue. This reinit will result in loosing the
> FPU state of the process.
>
> Move clear_used_math() to a point after the FPU state has been stored
> onto the user stack.
>
> This issue is present from a long time (even before the xsave changes
> and the x86 merge). But it can easily be exposed in 2.6.28.x and 2.6.29.x
> series because of the __clear_user() in this path, which has an explicit
> __cond_resched() leading to a context switch with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.28.x, 2.6.29.x]
This one get lost?
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 22:24 Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21 22:49 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2009-04-21 22:51 ` [stable] " H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-21 22:59 ` Chris Wright
2009-04-22 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090421224951.GD24073@hera.kernel.org \
--to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome