From: Kasparek Tomas <kasparek@fit.vutbr.cz>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NFS client packet storm on 2.6.27.x
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:27:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090422172707.GC57877@fit.vutbr.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090418051739.GL64731@fit.vutbr.cz>
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:17:39AM +0200, Kasparek Tomas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:08 +0100, Kasparek Tomas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:32:27AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > > A binary wireshark dump of the traffic between one such client and the
> > > > server would help.
> > >
> > > I was able to finally got the tcpdump. I got it from 2.6.27.19 client but
> > > after several weeks without problems. I include the file and place it on
> > > http://merlin.fit.vutbr.cz/tmp/nfs/dump_kas2_mat.dump_small (have over 1GB
> > > of dump, but it's all the time the same SYN+RST packets). The packet rate
> > > maxed at 260000pps from two clients.
> > >
> > > This dump is taken from server after reset (the server does not respond
> > > even to keybord) before clients are disconnected/rebooted. To remind it - all
> > > clients seems to work well with reversed
> > > e06799f958bf7f9f8fae15f0c6f519953fb0257c
> >
> > Yes. I saw that behaviour when testing at Connectathon last week. When
> > one of the servers I was testing against crashed and later came up
> > again, the patched client went into that same SYN+RST frenzy. I'm
> > planning to look at this now that I'm back at home.
>
> Hi, got a bit more data today as I get to the client early before it become
> unresponsible.
>
>
> The lockup may be becouse I disconnected the cable from that client to stop
> the packet storm, but still the backtrace may be usefull.
>
> Is there anything else I can do, that will help with this problem?
Hi,
(I changed the SUBJ to be more descriptive for current problem)
I got another client lockup today. It was a desktop so I have some more
dmesg warnings about soft lockup caused probably by network cable unplug
(but hopefully still showing what happens in rpciod) on
http://merlin.fit.vutbr.cz/tmp/nfs/pckas-dmesg
I can check with top, that rpciod was using 100% cpu. I limited the flow
from client to server with firewall so I was able to save the server and
get some tcpdump -s0 data (actually RPC null with ERR response from server)
Just to remind, the client is 2.6.27.21 (i386), the server is 2.6.16.62
(x86_64).
Please let me know if I can do anything more, this is really paintfull for
me.
--
Tomas Kasparek, PhD student E-mail: kasparek@fit.vutbr.cz
CVT FIT VUT Brno, L127 Web: http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~kasparek
Bozetechova 1, 612 66 Fax: +420 54114-1270
Brno, Czech Republic Phone: +420 54114-1220
jabber: tomas.kasparek@jabber.cz
GPG: 2F1E 1AAF FD3B CFA3 1537 63BD DCBE 18FF A035 53BC
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1231782009.7322.12.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <1231809446.7322.17.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <20090113152201.GD47559@fit.vutbr.cz>
[not found] ` <20090116104802.GF47559@fit.vutbr.cz>
[not found] ` <20090118130835.GH47559@fit.vutbr.cz>
[not found] ` <20090120150301.GG47559@fit.vutbr.cz>
[not found] ` <1232465547.7055.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <20090303120848.GV89843@fit.vutbr.cz>
[not found] ` <1236089767.9631.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <20090418051739.GL64731@fit.vutbr.cz>
2009-04-22 17:27 ` Kasparek Tomas [this message]
2009-04-29 12:12 ` Steve Dickson
2009-04-29 14:57 ` Kasparek Tomas
2009-06-25 5:55 ` Kasparek Tomas
2009-07-13 11:12 ` Kasparek Tomas
2009-07-13 17:20 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-07-13 17:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-07-28 18:31 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090422172707.GC57877@fit.vutbr.cz \
--to=kasparek@fit.vutbr.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®