Re: [PATCH 9/9] omap mmc host: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.

[Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1227 bytes --]

Should I queue this up or do you want to do something differently for
this?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:55:21 +1000
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com> wrote:

> 
> disable_irq() should wait for all running handlers to complete
> before returning.  As such, if it's used to disable an interrupt
> from that interrupt's handler it will deadlock.  This replaces
> the dangerous instances with the _nosync() variant which doesn't
> have this problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> index 5570849..d5ea652 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  		del_timer(&host->cmd_abort_timer);
>  		host->abort = 1;
>  		OMAP_MMC_WRITE(host, IE, 0);
> -		disable_irq(host->irq);
> +		disable_irq_nosync(host->irq);
>  		schedule_work(&host->cmd_abort_work);
>  		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  	}


-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]