Re: [GIT PULL] x86: cleanup alternative.h

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:

> Ingo, do you think the cleanup below would be worth merging ? It 
> adds the ability to use ALTERNATIVE() directly in gcc inline 
> assembly _and_ cleans up the current alternative*() cut-and-paste 
> coding style. :)

Sure it's worth it! Your patch removes quite a bit of code:

   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

One small style detail:

> +/* alternative assembly primitive */
> +#define ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr, feature) \
> +	      "661:\n\t" oldinstr "\n662:\n"			\
> +	      ".section .altinstructions,\"a\"\n"		\
> +	      _ASM_ALIGN "\n"					\
> +	      _ASM_PTR "661b\n"		/* label */		\
> +	      _ASM_PTR "663f\n"		/* new instruction */	\
> +	      "	 .byte " __stringify(feature) "\n"	/* feature bit */ \
> +	      "	 .byte 662b-661b\n"	/* sourcelen */		\
> +	      "	 .byte 664f-663f\n"	/* replacementlen */	\
> +	      ".previous\n"					\
> +	      ".section .altinstr_replacement,\"ax\"\n"		\
> +	      "663:\n\t" newinstr "\n664:\n"  /* replacement */	\
> +	      ".previous"

Please try to align both the continuation backslashes and the 
comments vertically. Something like:

> +#define ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr, feature)			 \
> +									 \
> +	"661:\n\t" oldinstr "\n662:\n"					 \
> +	".section .altinstructions,\"a\"\n"			 	 \
> +	_ASM_ALIGN "\n"						 	 \
> +	_ASM_PTR "661b\n"			   /* label           */ \
> +	_ASM_PTR "663f\n"			   /* new instruction */ \
> +	 "	 .byte " __stringify(feature) "\n" /* feature bit     */ \
> +	 "	 .byte 662b-661b\n"		   /* sourcelen       */ \
> +	 "	 .byte 664f-663f\n"		   /* replacementlen  */ \ 

... should do the trick. (also note the extra line after the #define)

	Ingo