From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757669AbZD2FXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751580AbZD2FXH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42471 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbZD2FXE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:20:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ring-buffer: fix printk output Message-Id: <20090428222024.8db50539.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090429045908.394874083@goodmis.org> References: <20090429044814.138790038@goodmis.org> <20090429045908.394874083@goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:48:19 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > - printk_once(KERN_WARNING "Tracing recursion: depth[%d]:" > + printk_once(KERN_WARNING "Tracing recursion: depth[%ld]:" hrmph. I didn't know that printk_once() existed, and I should have known. I wonder how many other people don't know. Should it use unlikely()?