mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:11:15 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430151008.D21C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)


Changelog:
  since v1
  - use percpu_counter_sum() instead percpu_counter_read()


-------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpuacct: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING don't prevent percpu cputime count

cpuacct_update_stats() is called at every tick updating. and it use percpu_counter
for avoiding performance degression.

For archs which define VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, every tick would result
in >1000 units of cputime updates and since this is much much greater
than percpu_batch_counter, we end up taking spinlock on every tick.

This patch change batch rule. now, any cpu can store "percpu_counter_bach * jiffies"
cputime in per-cpu cache.
it mean this patch don't have behavior change if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n.

Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: b/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/sched.c	2009-04-30 11:37:47.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/sched.c	2009-04-30 14:17:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -10221,6 +10221,7 @@ struct cpuacct {
 };
 
 struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys;
+static s32 cpuacct_batch;
 
 /* return cpu accounting group corresponding to this container */
 static inline struct cpuacct *cgroup_ca(struct cgroup *cgrp)
@@ -10250,6 +10251,9 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cpuac
 	if (!ca->cpuusage)
 		goto out_free_ca;
 
+	if (!cpuacct_batch)
+		cpuacct_batch = jiffies_to_cputime(percpu_counter_batch);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++)
 		if (percpu_counter_init(&ca->cpustat[i], 0))
 			goto out_free_counters;
@@ -10376,7 +10380,7 @@ static int cpuacct_stats_show(struct cgr
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
-		s64 val = percpu_counter_read(&ca->cpustat[i]);
+		s64 val = percpu_counter_sum(&ca->cpustat[i]);
 		val = cputime64_to_clock_t(val);
 		cb->fill(cb, cpuacct_stat_desc[i], val);
 	}
@@ -10446,7 +10450,7 @@ static void cpuacct_update_stats(struct 
 	ca = task_ca(tsk);
 
 	do {
-		percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val);
+		__percpu_counter_add(&ca->cpustat[idx], val, cpuacct_batch);
 		ca = ca->parent;
 	} while (ca);
 	rcu_read_unlock();



             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-30  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-30  6:11 KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-04-30  6:18 ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-30  8:28   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-30  8:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-30  8:52     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-30  9:02       ` Balbir Singh
2009-04-30  8:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-01  1:10 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-01  1:45   ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090430151008.D21C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balajirrao@gmail.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®