From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763077AbZD3PfZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:35:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757801AbZD3PfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:35:05 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49476 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755022AbZD3PfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:35:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:34:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , Zhao Lei , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GIT PULL] tracing/workqueue: fix 32 bits unfriendly 64 bits division Message-ID: <20090430153414.GA2703@elte.hu> References: <20090430145425.GA5974@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090430145425.GA5974@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Here is a fix for the build error you reported. This branch can be > pulled independantly or on top of tracing/workqueue from the > previous pull-request. > > Thanks. > > > The following changes since commit 10c494ea1b75f96d5fca78178732d79e68129cc0: > Frederic Weisbecker (1): > tracing/workqueue: fix 32 bits unfriendly 64 bits division > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git tracing/workqueue-2 Thanks, i have pulled this into tip:tracing/workqueues - but that is a temporary branch, lets hold off on merging it into tracing/core, until some of the more fundamental criticisms of Andrew are addressed, ok? Ing