From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: x86: changed output in /proc/cpuinfo for siblings
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
Commit 7ad728f98162cb1af06a85b2a5fc422dddd4fb78
(cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t)
changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings:
Example on an AMD Phenom:
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
Before that commit it was:
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings.
This is due to the following hunk of above commit:
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf
if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
- cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu)));
+ cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
Was this the intention or just a mistake?
In the latter case attached patch reverts this hunk.
Regards,
Andreas
---
x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo
Commit 7ad728f98162cb1af06a85b2a5fc422dddd4fb78 (cpumask: x86: convert
cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t) changed the value for
siblings in /proc/cpuinfo to be the number of thread_siblings instead
of core_siblings.
Revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index f93047f..d5e3039 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c,
if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
- cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
+ cpumask_weight(cpu_core_mask(cpu)));
seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-04 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-04 18:28 Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-05-04 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-04 18:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome