From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753387AbZEDWSs (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 18:18:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755192AbZEDWSY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 18:18:24 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:50782 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752520AbZEDWSX (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 18:18:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:12:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Message-ID: <20090504221208.GB29402@kroah.com> References: <20090504124129.GL7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504124433.GW8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504130638.GN7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504132119.GX8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504143919.GA6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504150834.GZ8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504153815.GB6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504155505.GA8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504161024.GC6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504162252.GB8822@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090504162252.GB8822@parisc-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:22:52AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:55:06AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > Indeed I do have access to lawyers. But what use is that? I could > > > presumably get an opinion for myself that I would not then be able to > > > share outside of Intel. > > > > I am glad you understand our situation, then! ;-) > > I'm assuming my situation would be analagous to yours. That doesn't > mean that I understand your situation at all. > > > > Can't you get the SFLC to issue a public legal opinion for you? Or maybe > > > the Linux Foundation? > > > > I have no clue whether this would work, but it is certainly worth > > exploring. Thank you for the tip!!! > > No problem. I'm always looking for ways to solve problems. > > I've never trusted advice from IBM laywers, ever since Greg spouted some > utter rubbish about the Copyright symbol that completely contradicts > US law. Doubt is good when dealing with lawyers :) But what was wrong with what they told us to do with regards to how to specify the copyright on a file? I don't recall seeing anything that contridicted what I was told, but that was many many years ago, so I probably am forgetting... thanks, greg k-h