From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq to setup io apic routing -v2
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:48:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506084845.48e0818c@hobbes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090506124558.GC19541@elte.hu>
On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:45:58 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > so we could set io apic routing only when enable device irq.
> >
> > also could make setup_IO_APIC_irqs and setup_ioapic_dest only handle
> > first ioapic...
> >
> > v2: remove one one not needed style change.
> > merge the patch only setup io_apic for acpi on in
> > setup_IO_APIC_irqs
> >
> > [ Impact: make mptable irq enable more like acpi is used, and
> > numa_irq_desc could get correct node when acpi=off ]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 148
> > ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 84 ++++++++--------------- 2
> > files changed, 103 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
> Ok, i guess this makes sense with acpi-less bootup modes.
>
> There's hefty impact on io_apic.c and pci/irq.c as well. The io-apic
> code already has a fair amount of changes queued up. Jesse: do you
> have pci/irq.c changes queued up? If you agree with the patch, how
> should we handle this?
No I don't have anything recent... and since this stuff is intertwined
with the io_apic changes I'm fine with it going through you guys.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-06 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 20:04 [PATCH] x86: don't print strange not connect ioapic Yinghai Lu
2009-04-30 8:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/acpi: move pin_programmed bit map to io_apic.c Yinghai Lu
2009-04-30 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/pci: add 4 more return param in IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector Yinghai Lu
2009-04-30 8:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/acpi: move setup io apic routing out of ACPI macro scope Yinghai Lu
2009-04-30 8:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq to setup io apic routing Yinghai Lu
2009-05-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq to setup io apic routing -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-06 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 15:48 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090506084845.48e0818c@hobbes \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome