From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760209AbZEFQqm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 12:46:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753184AbZEFQqb (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 12:46:31 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41853 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750868AbZEFQqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 12:46:30 -0400 X-Authenticated: #1587495 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Dw/4zE4/DdwRFGsgRht67n2ch99hnvp1VsFnTOz lRKiGR314L/TAc From: "Stefan Lippers-Hollmann" To: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: patch mm-fix-committed_as-underflow-on-large-nr_cpus-environment.patch added to 2.6.29-stable tree Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:46:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.29-2.slh.6-sidux-amd64; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebmunson@us.ibm.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, stable@kernel.org References: <20090504220454.3F71148FB8@coco.kroah.org> <20090505225932.GA4982@suse.de> <2f11576a0905051612p140e077fva214e954273a39df@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2f11576a0905051612p140e077fva214e954273a39df@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1420212.tFuVaQ5p5F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905061846.21126.s.L-H@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1420212.tFuVaQ5p5F Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi On Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:26:51AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >> Could you please post oops log? > >> current mmotm (include this patch) works fine on my x86_64 box. Then, > >> I have no hint now ;-) > > > > Attached is a picture of the oops. > > > > Hope this helps, >=20 > OK, the reason is 99% mis-applied patch. I've made rebased patch. >=20 > in my environment >=20 > 2.6.29.2 + original patch: panic > 2.6.29.2 + rebased patch: works well >=20 > Could you please try it? This patch seems to fix the problems, it's working without any issues on=20 all systems I could test so far. Thank you Stefan Lippers-Hollmann --nextPart1420212.tFuVaQ5p5F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkoBvt0ACgkQORbEMfgJlPYUtgCcCfoyOgF2TIsBslRTBG6GhYgE dg0AmgJnpoOX2XoEfXmaTiANk+Ikck0V =L5Vs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1420212.tFuVaQ5p5F--