From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [patch] security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090507084943.GB19133@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090507083851.GA19133@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > /* the callers of ptrace_may_access should be fixed */
> > > >
> > > > int ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
> > >
> > > Sigh, NAK, for the reasons explained in the previous mails.
> >
> > Agreed, but what about security_operations->ptrace_may_access ?
> >
> > It has the same (bad) name, but returns the error code or 0 on
> > success.
>
> Bad code should generally be fixed, or in exceptional circumstances
> it can tolerated if it's pre-existing bad code, but it should never
> be propagated. It has not spread _that_ widely yet, and is isolated
> to the security subsystem:
>
> include/linux/security.h
> security/capability.c
> security/commoncap.c
> security/root_plug.c
> security/security.c
> security/selinux/hooks.c
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c
btw. the most logical way to fix this would be to rename it from
ptrace_may_access to ptrace_access_check. Takes 30 seconds to do -
find the (completely untested) patch for that below.
Ingo
------------------->
Subject: security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The ->ptrace_may_access() methods are named confusingly - the real
ptrace_may_access() returns a bool, while these security checks have
a retval convention.
Rename it to ptrace_access_check, to reduce the confusion factor.
[ Impact: cleanup, no code changed ]
Signed-off-by-if-you-test-it: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
include/linux/security.h | 14 +++++++-------
security/capability.c | 2 +-
security/commoncap.c | 4 ++--
security/root_plug.c | 2 +-
security/security.c | 4 ++--
security/selinux/hooks.c | 6 +++---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 8 ++++----
7 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Index: tip/include/linux/security.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/include/linux/security.h
+++ tip/include/linux/security.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct audit_krule;
extern int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
int cap, int audit);
extern int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, struct timezone *tz);
-extern int cap_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
+extern int cap_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
extern int cap_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent);
extern int cap_capget(struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, kernel_cap_t *inheritable, kernel_cap_t *permitted);
extern int cap_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opt
* @alter contains the flag indicating whether changes are to be made.
* Return 0 if permission is granted.
*
- * @ptrace_may_access:
+ * @ptrace_access_check:
* Check permission before allowing the current process to trace the
* @child process.
* Security modules may also want to perform a process tracing check
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opt
* Check that the @parent process has sufficient permission to trace the
* current process before allowing the current process to present itself
* to the @parent process for tracing.
- * The parent process will still have to undergo the ptrace_may_access
+ * The parent process will still have to undergo the ptrace_access_check
* checks before it is allowed to trace this one.
* @parent contains the task_struct structure for debugger process.
* Return 0 if permission is granted.
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opt
struct security_operations {
char name[SECURITY_NAME_MAX + 1];
- int (*ptrace_may_access) (struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
+ int (*ptrace_access_check) (struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
int (*ptrace_traceme) (struct task_struct *parent);
int (*capget) (struct task_struct *target,
kernel_cap_t *effective,
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ extern int security_module_enable(struct
extern int register_security(struct security_operations *ops);
/* Security operations */
-int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
+int security_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
int security_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent);
int security_capget(struct task_struct *target,
kernel_cap_t *effective,
@@ -1798,10 +1798,10 @@ static inline int security_init(void)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child,
+static inline int security_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
unsigned int mode)
{
- return cap_ptrace_may_access(child, mode);
+ return cap_ptrace_access_check(child, mode);
}
static inline int security_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
Index: tip/security/capability.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/capability.c
+++ tip/security/capability.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ struct security_operations default_secur
void security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops)
{
- set_to_cap_if_null(ops, ptrace_may_access);
+ set_to_cap_if_null(ops, ptrace_access_check);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, ptrace_traceme);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, capget);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, capset);
Index: tip/security/commoncap.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/commoncap.c
+++ tip/security/commoncap.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, str
}
/**
- * cap_ptrace_may_access - Determine whether the current process may access
+ * cap_ptrace_access_check - Determine whether the current process may access
* another
* @child: The process to be accessed
* @mode: The mode of attachment.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, str
* Determine whether a process may access another, returning 0 if permission
* granted, -ve if denied.
*/
-int cap_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode)
+int cap_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode)
{
int ret = 0;
Index: tip/security/root_plug.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/root_plug.c
+++ tip/security/root_plug.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rootplug_bprm_check_security
static struct security_operations rootplug_security_ops = {
/* Use the capability functions for some of the hooks */
- .ptrace_may_access = cap_ptrace_may_access,
+ .ptrace_access_check = cap_ptrace_access_check,
.ptrace_traceme = cap_ptrace_traceme,
.capget = cap_capget,
.capset = cap_capset,
Index: tip/security/security.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/security.c
+++ tip/security/security.c
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ int register_security(struct security_op
/* Security operations */
-int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode)
+int security_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode)
{
- return security_ops->ptrace_may_access(child, mode);
+ return security_ops->ptrace_access_check(child, mode);
}
int security_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
Index: tip/security/selinux/hooks.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ tip/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -1854,12 +1854,12 @@ static inline u32 open_file_to_av(struct
/* Hook functions begin here. */
-static int selinux_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child,
+static int selinux_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
unsigned int mode)
{
int rc;
- rc = cap_ptrace_may_access(child, mode);
+ rc = cap_ptrace_access_check(child, mode);
if (rc)
return rc;
@@ -5318,7 +5318,7 @@ static int selinux_key_getsecurity(struc
static struct security_operations selinux_ops = {
.name = "selinux",
- .ptrace_may_access = selinux_ptrace_may_access,
+ .ptrace_access_check = selinux_ptrace_access_check,
.ptrace_traceme = selinux_ptrace_traceme,
.capget = selinux_capget,
.capset = selinux_capset,
Index: tip/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ tip/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char
*/
/**
- * smack_ptrace_may_access - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH
+ * smack_ptrace_access_check - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH
* @ctp: child task pointer
* @mode: ptrace attachment mode
*
@@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char
*
* Do the capability checks, and require read and write.
*/
-static int smack_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
+static int smack_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
{
int rc;
- rc = cap_ptrace_may_access(ctp, mode);
+ rc = cap_ptrace_access_check(ctp, mode);
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
@@ -2826,7 +2826,7 @@ static void smack_release_secctx(char *s
struct security_operations smack_ops = {
.name = "smack",
- .ptrace_may_access = smack_ptrace_may_access,
+ .ptrace_access_check = smack_ptrace_access_check,
.ptrace_traceme = smack_ptrace_traceme,
.capget = cap_capget,
.capset = cap_capset,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 22:47 [PATCH 3/3] ptrace: do not use task_lock() for attach Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-06 2:08 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-06 8:00 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3a] ptrace: add _ptrace_may_access() Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 20:32 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-06 20:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-06 21:09 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 23:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-07 0:21 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 6:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-07 8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 8:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-07 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-05-07 9:19 ` [patch] security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-07 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 8:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3a] ptrace: add _ptrace_may_access() Chris Wright
2009-05-07 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 9:20 ` Chris Wright
2009-05-07 9:54 ` James Morris
2009-05-07 10:20 ` your mail Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 11:37 ` security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check James Morris
2009-05-07 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-23 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23 19:24 ` [PATCH 0/1] mm_for_maps: simplify, use ptrace_may_access() Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-23 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-24 3:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-06-24 14:21 ` James Morris
2009-06-24 9:25 ` Roland McGrath
2009-06-24 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-24 1:08 ` security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check James Morris
2009-05-08 3:27 ` your mail Casey Schaufler
2009-06-24 14:19 ` security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check James Morris
2009-05-07 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3a] ptrace: add _ptrace_may_access() Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 9:49 ` [patch 1/2] ptrace, security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:47 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 18:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-15 1:10 ` Américo Wang
2009-05-15 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 9:50 ` [patch 2/2] ptrace: turn ptrace_access_check() into a retval function Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:47 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-06 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] ptrace: do not use task_lock() for attach Chris Wright
2009-05-06 23:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-06 23:27 ` Chris Wright
2009-05-06 23:48 ` James Morris
2009-05-07 1:17 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-08 12:18 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090507084943.GB19133@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®