From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762214AbZEHJTn (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 05:19:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757067AbZEHJTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 05:19:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59794 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752826AbZEHJTa (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 05:19:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:19:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tom Zanussi Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Adam Langley , Andrew Morton , Li Zefan , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, markus@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] seccomp: Add bitmask of allowed system calls. Message-ID: <20090508091912.GB3559@elte.hu> References: <396556a20805301217k293e5718h6bbf02b234897235@europa> <20090507221447.GE28770@elte.hu> <20090507230021.GC6472@nowhere> <1241760745.9416.37.camel@tropicana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1241760745.9416.37.camel@tropicana> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tom Zanussi wrote: > I guess it would be easier for seccomp to make use of the > filtering and reuse the syscall tracing facility if we added > filtering to the syscall tracer first. It would be useful to do > for the syscall tracer anyway, regardless of whether it (or > something similar) ended up being used by seccomp. > > Frederic, did you have any plans for that? If not, I can take a > look when I get the chance... Doing that would be very nice and useful indeed. Ingo