From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757157AbZEHK1T (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:27:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752278AbZEHK1F (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:27:05 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:56626 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751926AbZEHK1E (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 06:27:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:27:22 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Udo van den Heuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LinuxPPS status? Message-ID: <20090508112722.040e99ee@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A0406C3.7000507@xs4all.nl> References: <4A0406C3.7000507@xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 May 2009 12:17:39 +0200 Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Hello, > > Can anybody please give a summary of the things needing work before > LinuxPPS can go into the kernel? > Andrew posted something in february but are his objections still valid? > > Can we just fix the final bits and have it in the kernel whenever the > first occasion comes along? If you are getting no feedback just submit it next merge window. Either its offended nobody or they've forgotten to notice - in both cases submitting it will have the desired effect.