From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932387AbZEHTEY (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 15:04:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754285AbZEHTEJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 15:04:09 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34647 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754701AbZEHTEH (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 15:04:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 12:01:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc deadline scheduler performance regression for iozone over NFS Message-Id: <20090508120119.8c93cfd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:01:58 -0400 Jeff Moyer wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working on CFQ improvements for interleaved I/Os between > processes, and noticed a regression in performance when using the > deadline I/O scheduler. The test uses a server configured with a cciss > array and 1Gb/s ethernet. > > The iozone command line was: > iozone -s 2000000 -r 64 -f /mnt/test/testfile -i 1 -w > > The numbers in the nfsd's row represent the number of nfsd "threads". > These numbers (in MB/s) represent the average of 5 runs. > > v2.6.29 > > nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 > --------+---------------+-------+------ > deadline| 43207 | 67436 | 96289 | 107590 > > 2.6.30-rc1 > > nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 > --------+---------------+-------+------ > deadline| 43732 | 68059 | 76659 | 83231 > > 2.6.30-rc3.block-for-linus > > nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 > --------+---------------+-------+------ > deadline| 46102 | 71151 | 83120 | 82330 > > > Notice the drop for 4 and 8 threads. It may be worth noting that the > default number of NFSD threads is 8. > I guess we should ask Rafael to add this to the post-2.6.29 regression list.