mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mel@csn.ul.ie, riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Use GFP_PANIC for early-boot allocations
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:15:53 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090508161553.GL6132@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241797858.6311.2925.camel@laptop>

[Peter Zijlstra - Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:50:58PM +0200]
| On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 18:45 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
| 
| > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 17:42 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
| > > BUG_ON((gfp & __GFP_PANIC) && (system_state != STATE_BOOTING));
| > 
| > There's no technical reason not to use GFP_PANIC when system_state !=
| > STATE_BOOTING so I don't think it's needed. It's just that GFP_PANIC
| > (and BUG_ON) is IMHO too harsh for create_unique_id().
| 
| Shouldn't we handle every allocation failure after booting?

Definitely

| 
| I think it _is_ a bug to panic on allocation failures once we're
| running.
|

But Peter I believe there was no suggestion to use GFP_PANIC everywhere
to get rid of error handling. But rather to use it in case if kmalloc is
followed by BUG_ON.

| 
| I'm really not very fond of __GFP_PANIC as it stands, it seems to
| suggest its OK to ignore allocation failures, which would bring us back
| to the original UNIX error handling :/
| 
	-- Cyrill

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-08 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-08 15:10 Pekka Enberg
2009-05-08 15:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-08 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 15:36   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-08 15:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 15:45       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-08 15:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 16:15           ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-05-08 16:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 16:42               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 16:49               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-09  8:30               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-08 15:42   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-09  8:30     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090508161553.GL6132@lenovo \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®