Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: updates for tip

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> The first patch fixes a uninitialized variable. What bothers me 
> about this, is that gcc did not warn about it. My gcc warns about 
> a ton of variables that might not being initialized, but missed 
> one that actually is not!
> 
> I wonder if it is only my version of gcc:  4.2.2
> :-/
> 
> Please pull the latest tip/tracing/ftrace-1 tree, which can be found at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> tip/tracing/ftrace-1
> 
> 
> Steven Rostedt (2):
>       tracing: initialize return value for __ftrace_set_clr_event
>       tracing: add trace_set_clr_event to export event enabling function
> 
> ----
>  include/linux/ftrace_event.h |    2 ++
>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c  |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks Steve!

Note, the above branch gave conflicts in ring_buffer.c. But i pulled 
at commit 4671c79 from your tree which gave the same diffstat:

 Fast forward
  include/linux/ftrace_event.h |    2 ++
  kernel/trace/trace_events.c  |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Please double-check that i got the right bits. Thanks,

	Ingo