From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751541AbZEIHa3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 03:30:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750861AbZEIHaS (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 03:30:18 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:32949 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750826AbZEIHaS (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 03:30:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:32:27 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: __setup_param(), unique_id and vdso_setup Message-ID: <20090509073227.GA22397@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:24:21PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > just going through my outstanding list of kernel cleanup pedantry, > and i was reminded of this from include/linux/init.h: > > ===== > ... > #define __setup(str, fn) \ > __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0) > > /* NOTE: fn is as per module_param, not __setup! Emits warning if fn > * returns non-zero. */ > #define early_param(str, fn) \ > __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 1) > ... > ===== > > in short, both invocations of __setup_param() use identical second > and third parameters, and a tree-wide grep shows: > > $ grep -rw __setup_param * > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c:__setup_param("vdso=", vdso32_setup, vdso_setup, 0); > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early) \ > include/linux/init.h: __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0) > include/linux/init.h: __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 1) > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn) /* nothing */ > $ > > so apart from that single exception involving "vdso", that macro > could be simplified to just get rid of that third parameter. is there > something special about the vdso boot-time parm that *requires* it to > be the only boot-time parm in the entire kernel to have a different > unique id? just curious. or does that have to be preserved for > out-of-tree builds? No - so please go ahead and clean it up. Thanks, Sam