From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754247AbZEIN1n (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 09:27:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751842AbZEIN1e (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 09:27:34 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:35764 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbZEIN1e (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2009 09:27:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:27:11 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: nigel@tuxonice.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce Message-ID: <20090509132711.GD10859@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <200905081611.41865.rjw@sisk.pl> <1241819569.19600.281.camel@nigel-laptop> <200905090046.21282.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905090046.21282.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > And we have different ideas about how things should be done. Userspace > > vs kernel space. Providing tuning knobs vs not. And so on. > > This isn't _that_ important. Actually, I'm not against an entirely in-kernel > solution, as there are some clear benefits of doing it this way. We only > need to be careful enough not to break the existing setups. Would you elaborate? I would really hate to put progressbar painting into kernel; and if that's in userspace, we can do compression/encryption there too as well.... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html